Drawing for SPLASHES & SPARKLES

USPTO serial 78679228

SPLASHES & SPARKLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLASHES & SPARKLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark E. Teteault

MARK E TETEAULT BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES LTD101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3908UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale distributorships featuring collectibles, novelties, totes, jewelry and gift itemsACTIVESep 20, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 5, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 13, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance