USPTO serial 78679421
ENOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Whitby, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Hellwege (Reg. No. 28,808)
JAMES HELLWEGEPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Conducting auctions on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |