Drawing for HEAVEN

USPTO serial 78679496

HEAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Whitelaw

JENNIFER L WHITELAW3838 TAMIAMI TRL N FL 3NAPLES, FL 34103-3590UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail outlet services featuring tobacco products and related tobacco goods; wholesale distributorship featuring tobacco products and related tobacco goods; discount stores in the field of tobacco products and related tobacco goods; and on-line retail store services featuring tobacco products and related tobacco goodsACTIVE—
043Restaurant services; bar services; cocktail lounge services; wine bar services; cigar bar services; smoking lounge services; and cafes, excluding any of the foregoing rendered in the hotel, hospitality and travel industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 31, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 31, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance