USPTO serial 78679663
POTEVIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POTEVIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Schmidt, Lisa M. DuRoss and Jessica S. Sachs
Michael J. Schmidt, Lisa M. DuRoss and Jessica S. HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line advertising on computer networks; organizing trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; organizing exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; bid-making services, namely, bidding quotation and consulting services in the field of bidding quotation with regard to bids on telecommunication equipment and apparatuses; organizing technical exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposes; goods import and export agencies; sales promotion services; sales promotion services for others; procurement services, namely, purchasing contracts for the purchase and sale of goods and telecommunication equipment, apparatuses and services, and procurement services for others; personnel management consultation; moving and relocation services for businesses, namely, planning and implementing moves of offices; compilation of information into computer databases; accounting services; computer-operated telephone directory assistance services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Television broadcasting; sending of telegrams; electronic message sending; transmission of telegrams; telegram services, namely, telegraph transmission and telegraph communications; communications by telegrams; telephone communications services; communications by telephones; information transmission by telematic codes and teletypewriters; news agency services, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations and transmission of news; communications by cell phones; communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; electronic mail services; facsimile transmission; providing information in the field of telecommunication; paging services; communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; rental of telecommunications apparatus, namely, message sending apparatus; communications by fiber optics; rental of facsimile apparatus; rental of modems; rental of telecommunication equipment; rental of telephones; satellite transmission services; telecommunication services, namely, electronic bulletin board services; telecommunication routing and junction services; teleconferencing services, providing electronic bulletin boards for transmission of general-interest messages among users; providing online communications links that transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultancy in the field of intellectual property; technical research and technical project research, namely, scientific and technical consulting and research services relating to the telecommunication field; scientific research; computer project management services; project plotting services in the fields of telecommunications and computers; research and development of new products for others, namely, planning, development and technical support of electronic communication networks, technical research and development for others in the field of communication and the coal, hydrologic inspection, banking, tax and advertising industries; developing computer programs and software for others; consultancy in the field of environmental protection; quality control for others, namely, advisory services in the field of product development and software quality improvement, mobile communication equipment and low voltage apparatuses, technology supervision and inspection in the field of mobile communication equipment and low voltage apparatus; providing services for quality assurance in the field of telecommunications; providing consulting and assessment in the field of quality control; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification in the field of quality control; material testing; industrial design; computer programming for others; computer software design for others; updating of computer software for others; consultancy in the field of computer hardware; rental of computer software; recovery of computer data; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; duplication of computer programs; computer code conversion for others; data conversion of computer program data and information; creating and maintaining web sites for others; website hosting for others; installation of computer software; conversion of computer programs and data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by China Putian Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by China Putian Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POTEVIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |