Drawing for BEST OF STYLE

USPTO serial 78679915

BEST OF STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3317225Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with BEST OF STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*

Plus Government fees of $2,600

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016publication, namely, a featured section in a magazine naming winners of a reader's choice contest for goods and servicesACTIVEJun 11, 2005
035conducting public opinion polls featuring readers' choice regarding goods and servicesACTIVENov 1, 2004
036charitable fund raising, namely, sponsoring an event celebrating the winners of a readers' choice contest where certain proceeds are donated to local non-profit organizationsACTIVEJun 23, 2005
041entertainment services, namely, conducting contests featuring readers' opinions regarding the best goods and services in the area including recognizing the winners by providing trophies and awardsACTIVENov 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
May 15, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Nov 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 12, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 12, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2014815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 23, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance