Drawing for BLEU SUR BLANC

USPTO serial 78679936

BLEU SUR BLANC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLEU SUR BLANC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

BRENDAN P MCFEELY KANE KESSLER PC1350 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-4702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Antibacterial skin soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Body cream soap; Cosmetic soaps; Cream soaps; Deodorant soap; Essential oils for personal use; Fragrances for personal use; Hand soaps; Incense; Incense sticks; Liquid soaps for hands and face; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Perfumed soaps; Perfuming sachets; Sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; Sachets; Skin creams; Soaps for personal useACTIVE—
004Candles; Perfumed candles; Scented candlesACTIVE—
016PaperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 27, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 22, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance