Drawing for WALK-OFF HOME RUN

USPTO serial 78680068

WALK-OFF HOME RUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WALK-OFF HOME RUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Sutton

Paul J. Sutton GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-1400UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toiletries; deodorants and anti-perspirants for personal use; personal care products, namely, lotions and creams, shampoo, cologne and cologne water, hair gel, after shave balms, after shave creams, beauty creams, lipstick; sunscreen products, namely, suntan lotion, sunscreen lotion and after sun creamsACTIVE—
032Beverages, namely, fruit and juice drinks; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Alcoholic beverages, namely, beerACTIVE—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine and spirits; alcoholic cocktails containing milkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 4, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance