USPTO serial 78680412
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karrie G. Weaver
SCOTT W JOHNSTON MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried and freeze-dried fruit; fruit-based and vegetable-based snack foods; fruit pulp | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1995 |
| 032 | Fruit juices; fruit juice concentrates; fruit drinks; fruit nectars; fruit concentrates for use in making fruit juices and fruit juice blends; preparations for making fruit drinks; and vegetable juices | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |