USPTO serial 78680649
CROMIQA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROMIQA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denbighshire, GB
DENBIGHSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image intensified night vision equipment and thermal imaging night vision equipment, namely, night vision goggles, weapon sights, vehicle and aircraft night vision equipment, namely, night vision scopes, goggles, binoculars and monoculars; optical modules, namely, image transfer or display optical modules, optical beam transfer and optical beam splitter for night vision equipment and infrared objectives for airborne, land and naval applications; optical modules for head-up, head level, head down displays for airborne, land and naval applications; helmet mounted vision displays; binoculars; sighting telescopes; optical collimators; bar code scanners; video projectors and video cameras; optical instruments, namely, microscopes, stereoscopes, and telescopes; optical lenses, namely, zoom lenses and other lenses for optical instruments; illuminators for microscopes and endoscopes; video couplers; TV camera lenses; optic endoscopes; optical lenses, namely, telecentric lenses, lens objectives, lens eyepieces and catadioptric lens objectives; visible, infra-red and ultra violet optical components, namely, spherical lenses, aspheric lenses, flat lenses and optical windows, prisms, domes, cylinders mirrors, diffractive lenses, windows, front surface mirrors, hot mirrors, cold mirrors, dielectric mirrors, transparent mirrors, and anti-glare panels for visual displays; visible light, infra-red and ultra violet optical filters of following types, namely, long and shortwave pass filters, narrow band pass filters, wide band pass filters, square band filters, dual band filters, color separation filters, heat/light separation filters, dichroic filters, trichroic filters, neutral density filters, attenuations filters, edge filters, and laser blocking filters | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of night vision equipment and optical equipment and apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Coating services, namely, coating of lenses and optical components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and engineering services for others in the field of optical equipment, optical imaging systems and optical components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thales Optics Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by QIOPTIQ LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CROMIQA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |