Drawing for BISTRO D°

USPTO serial 78680799

BISTRO D°

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BISTRO D°?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark G. Lappin

MARK G LAPPIN FOLEY & LARDNER LLP111 HUNTINGTON AVEBOSTON, MA 02199UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Restaurant franchisingACTIVE—
041Culinary academy or schoolACTIVE—
043Self-service restaurants; western style restaurants; restaurants; cafeterias; cafe; snack-bars; food preparationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 6, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 16, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance