Drawing for LIFE. CHANGING.

USPTO serial 78680831

LIFE. CHANGING.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFE. CHANGING.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gabrielle S. Roth

Gabrielle S. Roth Dickstein Shapiro LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001living organisms, namely, genetically-engineered biological cells, viruses, pathogens, and light-emitting cells for scientific, laboratory and research useACTIVE—
009Light imaging equipment, namely, a camera and specimen chamber sold as a unit; computer software to collect, store, archive, retrieve, track, coordinate and analyze digital images; electronic databases in the fields of image acquisition, image processing, image analysis, image archival, image retrieval, genomics, proteomics, and informatics, all recorded on computer mediaACTIVE—
031living organisms, namely, transgenic miceACTIVE—
042Licensing of intellectual property, namely, licensing intellectual property rights in the field of living organisms for scientific, laboratory and research purposes, and licensing intellectual property rights in the field of biotechnology, and licensing intellectual property rights in the field of light imaging technology; scientific research for others in the field of drug discovery, compound screening, target selection, target validation, and drug efficacy; technology consultation in the field of assisting others in the development and implementation of animal modelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 28, 2006PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Aug 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance