USPTO serial 78680981
MINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A. Linzer, Esq.
Kenneth A. Linzer, Esq. Linzer & Associates12100 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 1275Los Angeles, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, headgear and footwear made of non-animal products, namely, footwear, sportswear, coats, sport coats, jackets, rainwear, shorts, sweat shorts, sweatsuits, sweat pants, vests, suits, tank tops, jeans, shirts, hats, gloves, socks, shoes, boots, slippers, sandals, caps, headbands and belts | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |