Drawing for ABC

USPTO serial 78681731

ABC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent A. Lee

KENT A LEE REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SC1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3197UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020chairs used for non-medical purposes in the healthcare industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 18, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance