Drawing for PHEROX

USPTO serial 78681732

PHEROX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHEROX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oils and fats; preserved and dried garden herbs; weed extracts for food; marrow oil; borage oil; dry extracts from vegetables, fruits, plants, trees and flowers; raisins; ginger; ginkgo biloba; preserved soybeans for food, plant-based preparations made from fruits and vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 5, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance