Drawing for SOLAVITE

USPTO serial 78681977

SOLAVITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLAVITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN R. McGINLEY, ESQ.

BRIAN R. McGINLEY, ESQ. SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPPO BOX 061080 WACKER DRIVE STATIONSEARS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Physical catalyst for cleaning scales formed by carbonates, sulphates, silicate oxide for application on buildings, boilers, cooling towers for water treatment; for descarbonization on motors of automobiles in general; and for descaling crude oil lines, pipes and oil ductsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance