USPTO serial 78682087
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Dillon
Joan L. Dillion Joan Dillon Law, LLC3522 Ashford Dunwoody RoadPMB 235Atlanta, GA 30319| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software development | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |