Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78682794?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78682794. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BRAINVISA RAPIDEL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78682794, the listed owner(s) include: Brainvisa Technologies Ltd., Brainvisa Technologies Ltd..

What is USPTO serial number 78682794?

Serial number 78682794 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BRAINVISA RAPIDEL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of BRAINVISA RAPIDEL?

BRAINVISA RAPIDEL (78682794) currently shows USPTO status code 605 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover BRAINVISA RAPIDEL?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78682794

BRAINVISA RAPIDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605

Filing date: Aug 1, 2005
Status date: Jul 7, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office: OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAINVISA RAPIDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Brainvisa Technologies Ltd.
Baner, Pune, IN
Other trademarks owned by Brainvisa Technologies Ltd.
Brainvisa Technologies Ltd.
Baner, Pune, IN
Other trademarks owned by Brainvisa Technologies Ltd.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Educational services, namely, developing, creating, arranging, providing, and conducting online distance learning instruction and courses at the college, post-graduate and workplace levels relating to human resources, project management, aviation, logistics, pharmaceuticals, telecom, communications, software skills, engineering and distributing software and courseware in connection therewith	ABANDONED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 8, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 7, 2008	MAB5	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION	—
Jul 7, 2008	ABN5	ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION	—
Jun 26, 2008	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
Jun 23, 2008	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Jun 20, 2008	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
May 27, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Apr 22, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Apr 22, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 22, 2008	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Apr 22, 2008	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 22, 2008	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 22, 2008	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Mar 31, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Mar 31, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 21, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 20, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 22, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 20, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 14, 2007	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 14, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 17, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 17, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 26, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 24, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 21, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 30, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 30, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 27, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 6, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—