USPTO serial 78682827
LAMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Carroll
Robert M. Carroll Collective Brands, Inc. - Law Dept.3231 SE Sixth AvenueTopeka, KS 66607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Bicycle helmets; cases for spectacles and sunglasses; frames for spectacles and sunglasses; lenses for sunglasses; protective helmets; snow goggles; sports eyewear; sports helmets; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Binders; colour pencils; coloured pens; drawing rulers; envelopes for stationery use; felt pens; felt writing pens; file pockets for stationery use; folders; gift wrapping paper; lap boards for reading and writing; loose leaf paper; notebook paper; office stationery; paper; pen and pencil cases and boxes; pen or pencil holders; pencil or pen boxes; pencil ornaments; pencil sharpeners; pens; pouches for writing instruments; printed calendars; rubber erasers; spiral notebooks; stationery; stationery-type portfolios; writing instruments; writing pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFESTYLE BRANDS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Lifestyle Brands Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifestyle Brands Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LAMAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |