USPTO serial 78682898
WIREMOLD LEGRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIREMOLD LEGRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hartford, CT
West Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Hilton
JOHN C HILTON CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-3402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wire and cable management systems for electrical power cables, data cables, communication cables and fiber optic cables for use on walls, under and on floors, as well as overhead and in-wall installations, comprising fiber optic cable, electric copper wires, and electric raceways, wireways, cable trays, power poles, conduits, columns, and fittings and accessories therefore; namely, raceway end fittings, raceway couplers, raceway wireclips, raceway elbow assemblies, raceway reducers, electrical junction boxes, electrical receptacles, electrical connectors, raceway offsets, electrical outlet devices and raceway covers, in-floor aftersets, in-floor poke-thrus, in-floor junction box supports, raceway transition fittings, raceway drop down fittings, raceway hangers, raceway clamps, raceway wall brackets, raceway mounted fiber optic cable storage devices, wireless access point enclosures, modular wiring systems, smoke and flame impeding devices, electrical surge protectors and indicators, electrical power strips, electrical outlet plugs, and electrical cabinets, racks and modules housing such surge protectors, and electrical surge indicators and protectors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |