USPTO serial 78682978
AAJ TAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with AAJ TAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Delhi-110001, IN
New Delhi-110001, IN
New Delhi-110001, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jami A. Gekas
Jami A. Gekas Foley & Lardner LLP321 North Clark StreetSuite 3000Chicago, IL 60654-4762Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | television broadcasting; streaming of video material on the Internet | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2010 |
| 041 | production of television programs; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring current event, entertainment and sports news, and conducting contests on-line; providing online non-downloadable publications, namely, newspapers, newsletters, and magazines in the fields of news, business, politics, entertainment, fiction, and sports and leisure | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Living Media India Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Living Media India Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Living Media India Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AAJ TAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |