Drawing for MOBILE VIDEO INTERFACE

USPTO serial 78683217

MOBILE VIDEO INTERFACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MOBILE VIDEO INTERFACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C Gilmore

RICHARD C GILMORE Maschoff Brennan Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wrigh111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor devices and semiconductor chips; computer software, computer program; software and programs for use with or in relation to mobile communications and mobile devices; computer software supplied by the internet; computer software and telecommunications apparatus (including modems) to enable connection to databases and the internet; parts and fittings for all the foregoing goods in Class 9; computer hardware; telecommunication, telephonic and communications apparatus and equipment, mobile communication devicesACTIVE—
042Online provision of computer program installation and maintenance of computer software; information provided online from a computer database or from the internet; design, programming, development and maintenance of computer software; testing or research on electricity; testing and research of the electrical performance of semiconductor devices; design of semiconductor devices and chips; consultancy services for all said services in Class 42; installation and repair services in Class 42 for mobile communications equipment and apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance