USPTO serial 78683473
Serial No. 78683473
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78683473?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Natland
SUSAN M NATLAND KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, tracheostomy and ventilator valves | ACTIVE | Oct 28, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |