USPTO serial 78683787
Serial No. 78683787
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78683787?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Kelly
JOHN E KELLY KELLY LOWRY & KELLEY LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, IMITATION JEWELRY AND COSTUME JEWELRY AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, BEADS, WOOD BEADS, CLAY BEADS, METAL BEADS, PLASTIC BEADS, GLASS BEADS, STONE BEADS, CLOISONNE BEADS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF JEWELRY; STRINGS OF BEADS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF JEWELRY; PEARLS; RHINE STONES; DECORATIVE JEWELRY CHAIN, RING CASTINGS; PIN CASTINGS; MINIATURE ANIMAL AND FISH FIGURINES MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS, AND MINIATURE PEOPLE FIGURINES MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; ORNAMENTAL PINS; JEWELRY BRACELETS; CHARMS; JEWELRY CHAINS; EAR CLIPS; EAR WIRES BEING JEWELRY; TIE CLIPS; EARRINGS; FIGURES OF PRECIOUS METALS; JEWELRY BOXES OF PRECIOUS METALS; NECKLACES; PENDANTS; RINGS BEING JEWELRY; SCULPTURES OF PRECIOUS METALS; AND JEWELRY FINDINGS | ACTIVE | May 23, 2006 |
| 028 | HOBBY CRAFT KITS CONSISTING OF POM POMS, CHENILLE, FOAM,WIRES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAKING SIMULATED CREATURES,CRITTERS, MONSTERS, PEOPLE, ANIMALS AND CHARACTERS;HOBBY CRAFT KITS CONSISTING OF BEADS, CORDS, AND RINGS FOR MAKING SIMULATED CREATURES, CRITTERS, MONSTERS, PEOPLE,ANIMALS, CHARACTERS AND THEME PROJECTS; HOBBY CRAFT KITS CONSISTING OF BEADS, STRINGS OF BEADS, WIRES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAKING TOYS; MINIATURE CREATURES,CRITTERS, MONSTERS, PEOPLE, ANIMALS, AND VEHICLES; HOBBY CRAFT KITS WITH FOAM PIECES, BEADS, CHENILLE, POM POMS,WIRES AND INSTRUCTIONS SOLD AS A UNIT FOR MAKING TOYS | ACTIVE | May 23, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |