USPTO serial 78683807
EPSON TOYOCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3565907Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2009
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPSON TOYOCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOKYO, JP
EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
TOKYO, JP
EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
TOKYO, JP
EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
TOKYO, JP
Toyo Tsushinki Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Toyo Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.
Kawasaki-shi, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz
ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Crystal sensors, namely, temperature sensors and pressure sensors; electric and electronic gyro crystal sensors for detecting angular velocity; oscillators, namely, TCXO (Temperature Compensated Crystal Oscillator), VCXO (Voltage Controlled Crystal Oscillator), OCXO (Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator), programmable oscillators, clock oscillators, and atomic oscillators, namely, RB (Rubidium) oscillators; crystal units and resonators, namely, tuning fork crystal resonators and AT cut crystal resonators; SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave) devices, namely, SAW resonators and SAW filters; crystal filters, namely, monolithic crystal resonator filters; optical devices, namely, optical filters, optical wave plates, dichroic optical prisms for liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors, video projectors, liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) projectors, light emitting diode (LED) projectors and cathode ray tube (CRT) projectors, optical pick ups, namely, read heads for optical drives; optical mirrors, optical gratings in the nature of a component that is based on a periodic variation of the refractive index on optical glass used in optical pickups for tracking servo systems and spectral analyzer as dispersion elements; optical low pass filters, heat sinkplates for liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors, video projectors, liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) projectors, light emitting diode (LED) projectors and cathode ray tube (CRT) projectors, and etalon optical filters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEIKO EPSON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by EPSON TOYOCOM KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by Toyo Tsushinki Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Toyo Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EPSON TOYOCOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |