Drawing for SG

USPTO serial 78684489

SG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective helmets for sports; cricket helmetsACTIVE—
025Athletic uniforms, jerseys, tracksuits, sports jackets, ski suits with and without linings, sporting trousers, bathing trunks and bathing suits, coats, parkas, waistcoats, caps, gloves, socks, headbands, performance underwear, trousers, pullovers, vests, sporting shirts, sporting T-shirts, hats, sporting footwear, cricket trousers, cricket shirts, cricket sweaters, shorts, track suits, t-shirts, sweat shirts and hosieryACTIVE—
028Golf clubs, tennis racquets, baseball bats, soccer balls, shin guards, cricket balls, cricket bats, cricket thigh guards, cricket thigh pads, cricket elbow guards, cricket abdominal guards, cricket chest guards, protective padding for playing cricket, baseball and football, face masks for cricket, baseball, football and hockey, baseball gloves, boxing gloves, hockey gloves, golf gloves, workout gloves, gloves for cricket players, hand gloves for cricket wicket keepers, bags specially adapted for sports equipment, exercise treadmills, exercise equipment, namely, stationary cycles, exercise machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2008ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance