USPTO serial 78684559
STRAUSS E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRAUSS E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Natter
NATTER & NATTER NATTER & NATTER501 5TH AVE STE 808NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MILK, DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM; ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; SALADS, EXCEPT MACARONI, RICE AND PASTA SALADS; CHEESE, YOGURT, AND SOY-BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |