USPTO serial 78690575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Barricella
SUSAN BARRICELLA RUTAN & TUCKER LLP611 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1931UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entertainment systems and accessories for motor vehicles, namely, monitors, LCD transmitters, cameras, cables, headphones, amplifiers, TV tuners, switches, AM/FM transmitters and receivers, line output converters, ground loop isolators, power accessories, fused holders, distribution blocks, fuse blocks, antennas, DVD players, MP3 players, video game console docking station, global positioning software, and navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of an on-board computer | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicle alarm and security systems comprised of car alarm, keyless entry and ignition devices, and remote starters with paging capability and optional AM or FM transmitter | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |