Drawing for CHANNELBLAST

USPTO serial 78714420

CHANNELBLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHANNELBLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dusan Clark

DUSAN CLARK SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6534UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer peripherals, non-volatile computer memory hardware, computer mouse, computer cables, cable storage devicesACTIVE—
016adhesive note pads, adhesive note paper, note pads, pens, pencilsACTIVE—
021Coffee cups, mugs, sports bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, hats, caps, visors, shirts, t-shirts, jacketsACTIVE—
038Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; providing an electronic bulletin board for the exchange of messages and information among users in the field of general interest via multi-user global computer information networksACTIVE—
041Entertainment services namely production of fiction and non-fiction based audio-video programs via the internet; providing a database in the fields of news, television programs, documentaries, talk show and interview programs, games, trivia, current and historical events, and other types of entertainment informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance