Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78714600?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78714600. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FOUNDED BY FIREMEN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78714600, the listed owner(s) include: Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78714600?

Serial number 78714600 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FOUNDED BY FIREMEN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of FOUNDED BY FIREMEN?

FOUNDED BY FIREMEN (78714600) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover FOUNDED BY FIREMEN?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78714600

FOUNDED BY FIREMEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 16, 2005
Status date: Dec 12, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: BLAIR, JASON
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOUNDED BY FIREMEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc.
Jacksonville, FL
Other trademarks owned by Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. Vermut

RICHARD S VERMUT ROGERS TWRS PA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207-1811UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	Restaurant services	ACTIVE	May 31, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 13, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 12, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 12, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 28, 2007	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Sep 25, 2007	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Sep 24, 2007	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Jul 27, 2007	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 27, 2007	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 27, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jun 27, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 22, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 5, 2007	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Apr 5, 2007	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Apr 5, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 5, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 6, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 25, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 25, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 23, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—