Drawing for TREERADAR

USPTO serial 78714647

TREERADAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREERADAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radar imaging systems for non-invasive assessment of tree and root health, comprised of radars, image processors, software, mobile mounts, carriages, printed instructions and carrying cases, all sold together as a unitACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, measuring, imaging and analyzing sub-surface tree viability and decay and internal structure of trees and root masses, and quantitative analysis of tree health and structural integrityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 31, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 5, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance