USPTO serial 78714691
ZEUGMA SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3784832Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZEUGMA SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center, 22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely, computer networking hardware for managing and improving the delivery of internet-based services to consumers by processing, identifying and controlling the transfer of data and images over a computer network; computer software for managing and improving the delivery of internet-based services to consumers by processing, identifying and controlling the transfer of data and images over a computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of computer networks and computer hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zeugma Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zeugma Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zeugma Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ZEUGMA SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |