CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SYLKHARESSE

USPTO serial 78715022

SYLKHARESSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYLKHARESSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Colucci

Frank J. Colucci COLUCCI & UMANS218 E 50TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022-7681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Ropes, string, commercial nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sails, sacks and bags for the transportation or storage of materials in bulk; padding and stuffing material not of rubber or plastics; raw fibrous textile materialsACTIVE—
023Yarns and threads, for textile useACTIVE—
024Textiles and textile goods, namely, upholstery fabrics, fabric bed and table coversACTIVE—
027Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; non-textile wall hangingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance