USPTO serial 78715188
INTELLIDIMMER "THE FLOURESCENT OR HID DAYLIGHT AUTO-ADJUSTABLE ENERGY SAVER"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIDIMMER "THE FLOURESCENT OR HID DAYLIGHT AUTO-ADJUSTABLE ENERGY SAVER"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, MX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accessories for lighting fixtures, namely plastic pole with electrical source in protective cover; Apparatus for adjusting headlights; Ballasts for gas discharge lamps; Ballasts for hallogen lights; Condensers ; Current converters; Current rectifiers; Cut-out switches; Electric actuators; Electric capacitors; Electric control devices for heating and energy management; Electric control panels; Electric converters; Electric current switches; Electric igniters used in connection with ballasts to start discharge lamps; Electric light dimmers; Electric light switches; Electric or electronic sensors for LIGHT INTENSITY; Electric resistors; Electric switches; Electric transformers; Electric voltage transformers; Electrical controllers; Electrical controlling devices; Electrical fuses; Electrical inductors; Electronic motion sensitive switches; Electronical sensors for measuring solar radiation; Emergency warning lights; Flashing safety lights; Fluorescent lamp ballast for electric lights; Illumination regulators; Illuminometers; Induction voltage regulators; Instruments and apparatus for controlling electric current, namely, electrical controllers for magnetic bearing control; Interfaces for detectors; Light switches; Lighting ballasts; Motion sensitive security lights; Power amplifiers; Power controllers; Power line conditioners; Power supplies ; Power switches; Power transformers for amplification; Power-line transmission machines and apparatus; Proximity sensors; Transformers; Transistors; Voltage monitor modules; Voltage regulators; Voltage regulators for electric power; Voltage stabilizers; Voltage stabilizing power supply; Voltage stablilzers; Voltage surge protectors; Voltage surge suppressors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |