USPTO serial 78715399
DEWBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3458010Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEWBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DEW Engineering and Development Limited
Ottawa, CA
Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
DEW Engineering and Development Limited
Ottawa, CA
Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
DEW Engineering and Development Limited
Ottawa, CA
Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristofer E. Halvorson
KRISTOFER E HALVORSON THE HALVORSON LAW FIRM1757 E BASELINE RD STE 130GILBERT, AZ 85233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Portable metal airport buildings, and metal structural parts therefore, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; portable metal airport expansion buildings, namely, non-motorized walkways, baggage loading/unloading bridges, terminal buildings and hold rooms, and metal structural parts therefore, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; portable metal airport expansions, namely, non-motorized walkways, baggage loading/unloading bridges, terminal buildings and hold rooms, and metal structural parts therefore, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; temporary portable metal airport buildings, and metal structural parts therefore, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; temporary portable metal airport expansion buildings, namely, non-motorized walkways, baggage loading/unloading bridges, terminal buildings and hold rooms, and metal structural parts therefore, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; metal structural parts for temporary portable metal airport expansions, namely, floors, walls, ceiling, and extension braces; portable airplane passenger loading bridges made primarily of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
| 007 | Transport systems for passenger boarding bridges, namely, movable mechanical passenger walkways for use in airports, motorized passenger boarding bridges, mechanical alignment actuators for controlling mechanical alignment between two objects, wheeled undercarriages for motorized passenger boarding bridges, wheeled undercarriage for motorized walkways for baggage loading and unloading; and control systems, namely, enclosed drives for all the foregoing goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
| 009 | Electronic controllers for controlling motion of moveable mechanical passenger walkways in airports; electronic control systems for coupling with and controlling of passenger boarding bridges; electronic controllers for installation within and for controlling passenger boarding bridges; electronically operated visual docking guidance systems used for passenger boarding bridges; computer software for controlling moveable mechanical passenger walkways and passenger boarding bridges in airports; computer hardware used in conjunction with the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
| 037 | Maintenance of airport systems, namely, airplane passenger loading bridges, airplane passenger loading bridge control systems, apron drive passenger loading bridges, apron drive passenger loading bridge systems, airport building structures, aircraft docking systems, aircraft loading and unloading systems; installation of airplane passenger loading bridges, airplane passenger loading bridge control systems, apron drive passenger loading bridges, apron drive passenger loading bridge systems, airport building structures, aircraft docking systems, aircraft loading and unloading systems; maintenance of airport computer networks relating to airport maintenance and/or airport systems; consulting services relating to installation and maintenance of airport jet bridge, walkway, baggage loading/unloading bridge, terminal building and hold room systems; consulting services relating to installation and maintenance of control systems for airport jet bridges, walkways, baggage loading/unloading bridges, terminal buildings, and hold rooms; consulting services relating to installation and maintenance of airport building structures, airplane passenger loading bridges, airplane passenger loading bridge control systems, apron drive passenger loading bridges, apron drive passenger loading bridge systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DEW Engineering and Development Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named DEWBRIDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |