CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ESOLES

USPTO serial 78715506

ESOLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESOLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Herbster

George A. Herbster Law Office of George A. Herbster100 Cummings CenterSuite 213CBeverly, MA 01915

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; Inner soles; Insoles ; Sandals; Shoe inserts for primarily non-orthopedic purposes; ShoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2010EAREEARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED—
Jan 29, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 31, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance