Drawing for THAI TASTE

USPTO serial 78715695

THAI TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THAI TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Kennedy

PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLP18TH & ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat; fish; poultry; game; meat extracts; preserved, dried, cooked and frozen fruits and vegetables; sauces, namely sauces primarily based on coconut milk; jellies; jams; eggs; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt; diary products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt; edible oils and fats; soups; coconut milk; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; constituents of meals, namely, items prepared from processed herbs, spices or ingredients prepared from meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, coconut or palm sugar; cooking ingredients, namely, processed herbs, spices or ingredients prepared from meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, coconut milk, herbs, spices, processed cereals or palm sugarACTIVE—
030Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; flavored rice; noodles; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from processed cereals; bread; pastry; ices; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; dressings; salad dressing; sauces; chili sauce; oyster sauce; soy sauce; fish sauce; curry pastes and sauces; ice; ice cream; ice milk; frozen yoghurt; candy; processed spices including herbs, lime leaves, kaffir lime leaves; basil; Thai basil; galangal; lemon grass; packaged meals consisting primarily of the foregoing or any of themACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance