Drawing for ET REALTY

USPTO serial 78715882

ET REALTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ET REALTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory B. Coy

GREGORY B COY KRIEG DEVAULT LLPONE INDIANA SQ STE 2800INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate brokerage servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 25, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance