Drawing for NEWZVIEWZ.COM

USPTO serial 78715927

NEWZVIEWZ.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWZVIEWZ.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dusan Clark

DUSAN CLARK SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6534UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripherals, non-volatile computer memory hardware, computer mouse, computer cables, cable storage containersACTIVE—
016adhesive note pads, adhesive note paper, note pads, pens, pencilsACTIVE—
021Coffee cups, mugs, sports bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, hats, caps, visors, shirts, t-shirts, jacketsACTIVE—
038Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; providing an electronic bulletin board for the exchange of messages and information among users in the field of general interest via multi-user global computer information networksACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of fiction and non-fiction based audio-video programs via the Internet; providing a database in the fields of television programs, documentaries, talk show and interview programs, games, trivia, current and historical events, and other types of entertainment informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance