USPTO serial 78716010
CHROMDURATEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505303Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHROMDURATEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
Jody L. Factor FACTOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, LTD.1327 W. WASHINGTON BLVD., SUITE 5G/HChicago, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | HOSE COUPLINGS FOR SHOWERS MADE OF METAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Contactlessly controlled sanitary thermostatically controlled valves and automatically controlled valves for water pipe and water supply systems, for bath, shower and washing installations; consumer electronics and information technology components, namely radios, television sets, personal computers, PCs, CD or DVD players for use or installation in showers, shower facilities or sanitary facilities; and, electronically controlled valves for controlling fluids as parts of sanitary facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | fittings for plumbing, water heating, bathing, showering, flushing, bidet and washing facilities, namely manually or thermostatically controlled valves as parts of sanitary facilities; showers, shower heads, shower head fixtures, shower tubes, spray nozzles made of plastic as parts of sanitary facilities; shower faucet extensions, water supply apparatus, namely, water inlets and water outlets as parts of sanitary facilities; water treatment equipment, namely cartridge filtration units; mechanical safety valves made of metal, the previously described goods as connection, control-, and safety fittings for sanitary installations; water conditioning units, lighting fixtures; parts of the previously described goods, ultraviolet lamps not for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | HOSE COUPLINGS FOR SHOWERS MADE OF NON-METAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | mirrors, non-metal bathrobe hooks, crystalware tray and shelf brackets made of glass or plastic; parts of the previously described goods not made of metal or precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Bath and shower accessories, namely, towel holders, cup holders, soap holders, hand towel holders, bath towel holders, toilet roll holders, spare toilet roll holders, sponge holders, and toilet brush holders; hand towel rings; soap dispensers; soap dishes; toilet brushes, all previously described goods being made of metal, glass, or plastic, but not made of precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HANSA METALLWERKE AG
- Other trademarks owned by HANSA METALLWERKE AG
- Other trademarks owned by HANSA METALLWERKE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CHROMDURATEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |