USPTO serial 78716029
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Sutton
PAUL J SUTTON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVE FL 14NEW YORK, NY 10166-1400UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS, TOTE BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, TRAVEL ACCESSORY BAGS, CREDIT CARD HOLDERS, CREDIT CARD CASES, HANDBAGS, BEACH BAGS, BRIEF BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, RUCKSACKS, TRAVELING BAGS, SUITCASES, WALLETS, PURSES, ZIPPED WALLETS, BILLFOLD WALLETS, BOOK BAGS, BACKPACKS, DUFFEL BAGS, KEYCASES, UMBRELLAS, BILLFOLDS, BRIEFCASES, BRIEF CASE TYPE PORTFOLIOS, ATTACHE CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CHANGE PURSES, FANNY PACKS, GYM BAGS, KNAPSACKS, LUGGAGE, POCKETBOOKS, SCHOOL BAGS, STRAPS FOR HANDBAGS AND LUGGAGE AND ACCESSORIES USED THEREWITH, NAMELY, SHOULDER STRAP PADS, HOLDERS, AND POUCHES; GOODS MADE OF LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, NAMELY, KEY CHAINS, HANDBAGS, WALLETS, BILLFOLDS, TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES; ADULTS AND CHILDREN PARTY GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |