USPTO serial 78716504
STIRLING LLOYD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3648855Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STIRLING LLOYD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
Knutsford, Cheshire, GB
Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
Cheshire WA16 6EF, GB
Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
Cheshire WA16 6EF, GB
CAMBRIDGE, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig K. Leon, Esq.
Craig K. Leon, Esq. GCP Applied Technologies Inc.62 Whittemore AvenueLegal Dept.Cambridge, MA 02140Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | waterproofing chemical compositions; synthetic resins that are used to repair and fill holes and cracks, adhere to surrounding materials and seal surfaces for use in foundations of buildings; waterproofing membranes in liquid chemical form for application by spraying for use in the construction and refurbishment of buildings and civil engineering structures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | coatings in the nature of resin based compositions and preparations for marking exterior surfaces and roads; coatings in the nature of resin based surface coloring compositions for marking exterior surfaces and roads; coatings in the nature of resin based surface coloring compositions; coatings in the nature of surface coloring compositions comprising resin and aggregate; coatings in the nature of primers for preparing surfaces for painting; [ coatings in the nature of resin based slip resistant floor coatings; ] coatings in the nature of skid resistant roadway coatings; coatings in the nature of pigmented coatings for the protection of concrete walls; coatings in the nature of decorative spray coatings and sealer coatings for use with concrete, stone and asphalt; [ acrylate resin coatings for use on concrete industrial floors; ] resin based roof coatings; [ slip resistant coatings for use on floors; ] acrylate resin coatings in the nature of bridge deck waterproofing, structural waterproofing and car park deck coatings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | [ expansion joints made of metal or made primarily of metal for floors and walls for use in construction or for use in civil engineering; metal expansion joints for use in roads, rail, bridges, tunnels, car parks or buildings; metal replacement parts for all of the aforesaid expansion joints ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [ sealants for construction joints, pavement joints and pipe joints; building insulation, namely, roofing insulation; ] waterproofing membranes and vapor barriers for use in the construction and refurbishment of buildings and civil engineering structures, namely, buildings, roofs, bridges, tunnels or car parks; waterproofing membranes for structural waterproofing or secondary containment for use in the construction and refurbishment of buildings and civil engineering structures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | surfacing materials for use on roads, walkways and foot bridges comprised of gravel aggregate in an acrylate resin matrix; [ cementitious compositions for repair and laying of pavement and industrial floors; ] surfacing materials for use on roadways, footpaths and pavement comprised of gravel aggregate in an acrylate resin matrix; [ paving systems for roofs, namely, vacuum concrete; ] resin based traffic deck surfacing membranes; roofing materials, namely, roofing membranes, non-metallic roofing slabs, and rubber matting; roofing membranes; [ roofing drainage layers, namely, non-metallic drainage sheets; expansion joints made of non-metal or made primarily of non-metal for floors and walls for use in construction or for use in civil engineering; non-metal expansion joints for use in roads, rail, bridges, tunnels, car parks or buildings ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | research and developments services for construction or civil engineering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Stirling Lloyd Polychem Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GCP APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STIRLING LLOYD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |