USPTO serial 78716507
R.E. SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R.E. SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waterbury, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
WESLEY W WHITMYER JR ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, LONG AND SHORT-SLEEVED POLO SHIRTS, DENIM SHIRTS, PEACHED TWILL SHIRTS, MOCKNECK SHIRTS, REVERSE FLEECE SHIRTS; CAPS AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |