USPTO serial 78716554
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Baila H. Celedonia
BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF AN INVESTMENT SECURITY | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |