Drawing for REXPOL

USPTO serial 78716636

REXPOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REXPOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary A. Essmann

GARY A ESSMANN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles, namely, implants and implant parts for humansACTIVE—
010Surgical and medical instruments and apparatus and components therefor, namely rasps, drills, screw drivers, monkey wrenches, and hammers for synthetic use; internal and external bone fixtures and components therefor, namely bone screws, bone plates, bone clamps, cerciages, and wires for use with artificial limbs, prosthesis and implants for hip, knee, finger, toe and shoulder joints; implants, namely osteosynthetic implants and components therefor, namely screws, pins,nails, plastic bearings and plastic inlays, namely for installing hip, knee, finger, toe and shoulder implants; orthopedic joint implants for hips, knees, fingers, toes, and shoulders, and components therefor, namely plastic bearing shells, and inlaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance