USPTO serial 78716745
ORTHOLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORTHOLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura F. Shunk
CHERYL L. FARINE HUDAK, SHUNK & FARINE CO. LPA2020 FRONT STREETSUITE 307CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44221Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | specialized implants and instruments for foot and hand surgery, namely, plates, screws, wires, fasteners, plate holders, benders, cutters, screwdrivers, drill guides, guide pins, forceps, retractors, depth gauges and salvage instruments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |