USPTO serial 78716779
VOXCO COMMAND CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOXCO COMMAND CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the call center and marketing research industry, namely, computer software for the management of calls and responses; computer software for collecting, analyzing, presenting, publishing, and archiving data for use in conducting surveys, marketing campaigns, and marketing research conducted by telephone and over the Internet; and computer software for allowing interfaces and links to other programs and databases for the call center and marketing research industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Informatics services and telematic survey services, namely, public opinion polling and surveys for collecting responses to questionnaires, namely, multi-extension telephone surveys, and capturing structured questionnaires using portable computer in the field of communications; consulting services in the field of development of strategies for the structure and management of surveys and processing, analyzing, and presenting data for all types of surveys and marketing research | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of computer programs customized to customer requirements for structuring questions, managing, collecting, analyzing, presenting, publishing, and archiving data for all types of surveys and marketing research conducted by the telephone and over the Internet; development of computer programs customized to customer requirements for allowing interfaces and links to other programs and databases for the call center and market research industry; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |