USPTO serial 78717159
WARRIOR SPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WARRIOR SPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. McKinnon
Daniel J. McKinnon New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.20 Guest StreetBrighton LandingBoston, MA 02135Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY TEE SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, COLLARED SHIRTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, MOISTURE MANAGEMENT GARMENTS, HATS, JERSEYS AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, LACROSSE BALLS,, LACROSSE HELMETS, LACROSSE EYEWEAR, LACROSSE NETS, LACROSSE GOALS; SOCCER BALLS, SOCCER GOALS, SOCCER GOALIE GLOVES, SOCCER SHIN GUARDS, SOCCER BALL INFLATING PUMPS; HOCKEY STICKS, HOCKEY GLOVES, HOCKEY STICK SHAFTS, HOCKEY STICK BLADES, HOCKEY SKATE GUARDS, HOCKEY SHOULDER PADS, HOCKEY SHIN PADS, HOCKEY ELBOW PADS, HOCKEY JOCKS, HOCKEY MOUTHGUARDS, HOCKEY PANTS, HOCKEY NECK GUARDS, HOCKEY SKATES, HOCKEY HELMETS, HOCKEY PUCKS; BASEBALL BATS, BASEBALLS, BASEBALL HELMETS, BASEBALL GLOVES, BASEBALL BASES; TENNIS RACKETS, TENNIS RACKET COVERS, TENNIS BALLS, TENNIS BALL CARRIERS; FIELD HOCKEY STICKS, FIELD HOCKEY BALLS, FIELD HOCKEY GOALS, FIELD HOCKEY GOGGLES, FIELD HOCKEY GLOVES; BASKETBALL HOOPS, BASKETBALLS; IN-LINE HOCKEY STICKS, IN-LINE HOCKEY SHIN GUARDS, IN-LINE HOCKEY SHOULDER PADS, IN-LINE HOCKEY MOUTHGUARDS, IN-LINE HOCKEY PANTS, IN-LINE HOCKEY NECK GUARDS, IN-LINE HOCKEY ELBOW PADS, IN-LINE HOCKEY PUCKS, IN-LINE HOCKEY SKATES, IN-LINE HOCKEY GOALS, IN-LINE HOCKEY HELMETS; FOOTBALL SHOULDER PADS, FOOTBALL JOCKS, FOOTBALL GLOVES, FOOTBALL PANTS, FOOTBALL MOUTHGUARDS, FOOTBALL FACEMASKS, FOOTBALL KNEE PADS, FOOTBALL ELBOW PADS, FOOTBALL KICKING TEES, FOOTBALL HELMETS, FOOTBALLS; VOLLEYBALLS, VOLLEYBALL KNEE PADS; SOFTBALL BATS, SOFTBALLS, AND SOFTBALL BASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WARRIOR SPORTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Warrior Lacrosse, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Warrior Lacrosse, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WARRIOR SPORTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |