USPTO serial 78717174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
Ann Lamport Hammitte Lando & Anastasi, LLP60 State Street, 23rd FloorBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing credit card, debit card, charge card and stored value prepaid card services, providing electronic payment card services; stored value electronic purse services; payment services, namely, electronic processing of micro-payments to Internet retailers, merchants and content providers with information stored in centralized database; providing electronic micro-payment processing services for Internet content, namely, electronic documents, photographs and information; electronic funds and currency transfer services; electronic payments services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; prepaid telephone calling card services; cash disbursement services; transaction authorization and settlement services, namely, credit card authorization services, transmission of transaction data via telecommunication systems to and from financial institutions for processing and transmission of authorization instructions and settlement instructions resulting from credit and debit card transactions; provision of debt and credit services by means of transponders which use radio signals to transmit the users' identification code to gasoline pumps or registers in order to automatically provide access to gasoline, food or merchandise while automatically charging purchases to the users' credit or debit card; check verification services; issuing and redemption services all relating to travelers' checks and travel vouchers advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |