USPTO serial 78717323
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Lake
JENNIFER RACKOFF SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP425 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) DVDs featuring information regarding HIV/AIDS and the role of the business community in fighting HIV/AIDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Printed materials, namely, magazines featuring information and articles regarding HIV/AIDS and the role of the business community in fighting HIV/AIDS; printed educational materials, namely magazines, booklets, brochures, guidebooks, white papers and summary reports featuring information regarding HIV/AIDS and the role of the business community in fighting HIV/AIDS; printed visuals in the nature of promotional materials regarding the fight against HIV/AIDS and the role of the business community in fighting HIV/AIDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Promoting public awareness of the need to mobilize the business community against HIV/AIDS; providing technical assistance in the establishment and operation of workplace programs on education/prevention and testing/treatment programs, community programs and partnerships with not-for-profit organizations, core business programs that support HIV/AIDS education and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Educational services, namely, providing employee and company training on HIV/AIDS, member workshops and roundtables focused on specific issues and challenges, presentations at business forums in the field of HIV/AIDS and mobilizing the business community against HIV/AIDS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |