USPTO serial 78717338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LONDON, GB
LONDON, GB
LONDON, GB
KUESSNACHT, CH
ZURICH, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia Stangle
Claudia Stangle Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OF WEBSITES; ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS AND ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG USERS IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL INTEREST; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2004 |
| 041 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION ON AND ABOUT SPECIAL EVENTS AND PARTIES, RECREATION, POINTS OF INTEREST, EDUCATION, AND BOOKING OF SEATS FOR SHOWS; PROVIDING NON-DOWNLOADABLE ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC BOOKS, MAGAZINES, JOURNALS AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF GENERAL INTEREST; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVISION OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE FILMS VIA AN ONLINE VIDEO-ON-DEMAND SERVICE | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |